Renault Clio MTV 1.2 Review

Watch this item
Renault Clio MTV 1.2
3.7 stars
Average rating for this product is: 3.7 out of 5

From 2 ratings and 10 reviews

Thumb up 90% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item


mfarley01's Review of Renault Clio MTV 1.2

27th Feb 2004

Overall Rating

0.5 stars
  • Value for money
    5 stars
  • Length of ownership
    50 years
  • Practicality
    5 stars
  • Year Manufactured
    2050
  • Performance
    5 stars
  • Reliability
    5 stars
Good Points

Time machine, warp engines, hover abilities, laser turrets, torpedo launcher, transforming capabilities.


Bad Points

Hefty fuel consumption, too loud at high speeds, high short term depreciation.


General Comments

Renault Clio MTV: The time machine in the boot makes the Clio a great option for nipping back and forth through time to correct past mistakes and observe future events. The warp engine and hover accelerator enable speedy get aways, perfect for evading the time police if they are chasing you. The bonnet mounted laser turrets and rear bay quantum torpedo launcher are excellent for neutralising Sunday drivers and Storm Troopers.

Despite it's plus points, the Clio eats up fuel like no business, and you'll need to have a steady supply of dilithium crystals to keep this bad boy going. The time machine is handy, but the ability to travel through space as well would have been a welcome feature. At warp factor 5 and above, the wind noise is unacceptable for a car from the future. Don't expect to get much of your investment back when the time comes to sell either, I saw one in Autotrader 2065 the other day which was on sale for a banana and a packet of crisps. Of course you could always pop back to a time when it was worth more and sell it then I suppose.

Remember - all reviews on Review Centre express the reviewer's opinion, not necessarily ours.
If you disagree with a review then please let us know by writing a review of your own or adding a comment.

Tweet This Review

On average, people found this review not helpful

How helpful did you find this review?