Have a picture of Nokia 8910i?, please send it to us.
| Value for Money | 6.9/10 |
|---|---|
| Reviewer Rating | 9/10 |
| Overall Rating | 9/10 |
By rabbhiyahiya
on 23rd Feb 2004
| Time Phone Owned | 1- 6 Months |
|---|---|
| Features | 8/10 |
| Reception | 10/10 |
| Style | 10/10 |
| Value for money | 8/10 |
| Overall value | 9/10 |
| | |
Sexyyyyy!!!!
Simple to Use.
Titanium
V.Good reception
Lack of features
If your a flash git like me then this Nokia 8910i is the mobile phone for you! The sheer satisfaction that you get out of clicking those two side buttons and watching the phone slide out of its shell is bliss! Okay...on a more serious note this is one eye catching phone. The features are DECENT but thats it. You get your basic nokia functions (good phone book/messaging services etc). Extra applications and features are lacking though, especially for a phone this expensive (£500ish). It comes with WAP, Bluetooth (a huge plus), a few extras (calc. stopwatch etc), and limited organizer facilites. Each function is not exceedingly brilliant and to be honest synicing it with a computer is v.hard (the bluethooth is not brilliant---get a sonyericsson if u need it badly) but if u need a relaible phone with an adequate measure of basic functions then this is for you.
Negatives: Small screen (complemetns phone but limits text viewing), SMS storage memomory (can only store 50 total!). Also, am a bit worried about the SPring mechanism, as flashy as it may be one of the buttons (there are 2 u have to simultaneously press) is becoming looser and mor 'ratty' by the day. SO much so that when you shake the phone you can hear minor rattle. I dont know if this is just my model but needless to say its ANNOYING!.
MMS messaging is LIMITED. You cannot send voice/sound files, only image.
Positives: Simple/Easy to use mobile.
Reception is brill. Is a definate chick magnet. Very good Nokia reliability. Colour screen.

| Helpful | Unhelpful | Agree | Disagree |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Total Respect: +2
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?