Report Abuse

Report this review to the Review Centre Team

Here at Review Centre we work hard to make sure we are the best place on the internet for honest, unbiased consumer reviews - we are grateful for your help in keeping us that way!
309641

Why are you reporting this review?

★★★★★
WRITE A REVIEW

“What sold me on the Omega Seamaster 2254.50 is the...”

Written on: 21/11/2007 by fats (3 reviews written)

Good Points
Value for money. Timeless design. Wins comparisons over Rolex Submariner.

Bad Points
Cumbersome but is a matter of getting used to.

General Comments
What sold me on the Omega Seamaster 2254.50 is the fact that it is the particular Omega model being compared to the Rolls-Royce of watches- the Rolex Submariner.



And when I read this review (http://www.rolexreferencepage.com/articles/2.html), I immediately knew I HAD to have one.



In that review the 2254.50 won the contest over the Submariner! Yet it has the perfect mix of something that can be worn on a daily basis and something just kept in the vault, as with the case of most Rolex owners I know.



I was considering the James Bond series, but then it's a trendy design one can easily get tired of. The 2254.50.00 seemed to have a more classic and timeless design. Yes just like the Submariner.



To think that this watch has many great reviews and is almost a third of the price of a Submariner, this had to be the buy of the century. In my case, I'll never waste my hard earned money on a Rolex.