Beretta 682 gold e. 32 Reviews

Click here if this is your business
★★★★☆
4.5 / 5
90% of users recommend this
Click here if this is your business
  • Value For Money

? Ask our helpful community of experts about this product or company
Beretta 682 gold e. 32 - Ask a question now

Media Gallery for Beretta 682 gold e. 32

Beretta 682 gold e.   32
Beretta 682 gold e.   32

Refine your search

Use the tools below to refine your search by only displaying reviews with a certain number of star ratings or to only show reviews from a certain time period. Eg click on '1 star' to just display the reviews we have which received a 1 star rating click or 'Within the last month' to display just reviews posted over the last month.

  • Average Rating Over Time
  • Within the last month ***** (From 0 reviews)
  • Within the last 6 months *** (From 0 reviews)
  • Within the last 12 months * (From 0 reviews)
★★★★★

“It took me over 10 years to finally buy a 32" Beretta...”

Written on: 02/11/2004 by oldfenners (1 review written)

It took me over 10 years to finally buy a 32" Beretta 682 gold e., from when I first used one back in about 1993 till this august when I eventually plucked up the courage to hand over the plastic and say.."I'll take it."
I'd pondered over the 30" model but decided on the 32", as I'd most recently been shooting a 391 semi auto and I'd got used to using a long gun and quite liked the extra "pointabillity",
Bamfords excellent gunshop at Eccleston in lancs were happy to order in the 32 incher for… Read Full Review

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Reckman's Response to oldfenners's Review

Written on: 01/08/2007

I'm in the research phase in getting a trap gun. Your comments are really helpful. Thanks!

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Rckhopper's Response to oldfenners's Review

Written on: 28/07/2010

That was a very helpful review.
<br/>
<br/>I'm in the process of considering between the 682 and the DT10, this review might have swung it in favour of the 682.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

366032_Sporterman's Response to oldfenners's Review

Written on: 13/05/2008

I also have a 32ins 682 gold e and whilst I agree with the comments about quality build, good looks etc the balance, in my opinion, is too neutral. I looked at a number of these guns before choosing one and they were all barrel light, the one I settled on has 1430 gram tubes ( heaviest I coud find) and just about balances on the pin with half chokes fitted. I think the gun would definately benefit from another 100 grams of barrel weight.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

341308_Mgman's Response to oldfenners's Review

Written on: 29/01/2008

I agree with this review because... I have the same gun and the writer takes the words out of my mouth.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Report this review Read 4 Comments
overview