Have a picture of Nike Steam FG Football Boots?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of Joe Stone.
Review by
Guest.
on 16th Feb 2008
User Rating : 9
Respect :
0
I love the Nike Stream FG's, ive just brought a pair and they are ace. They look mint and i feel like the ball is glued to me feet. Great boots, I cant wait for me next match
Guest.'s full review | 46 words
Review by
Guest.
on 18th Jan 2008
User Rating : 10
Respect :
0
overall brilliant and i highly recommend these boots 10/10
Guest.'s full review | 49 words
Review by
rory mc flynn
on 29th Nov 2007
User Rating : 10
Respect :
0
Nike steam FG are ideal for an attacking player, the bottom of them started to flip on mine after a year ( if this happens use super glue).
rory mc flynn's full review | 31 words
Review by
McKay
on 18th Jun 2007
User Rating : 10
Respect :
-1
Best pair of boots around! I had them for a whole season and the "swoosh" is only started fade.
McKay's full review | 96 words
Review by
benl193
on 20th May 2007
User Rating : 10
Respect :
-1
Fantastic value for money at about £50 a must buy and recommended to friends
benl193's full review | 80 words
Review by
waqowaqo
on 21st Apr 2007
User Rating : 7
Respect :
-1
Nike Steam FG - I just love it!
waqowaqo's full review | 43 words
Review by
LingeS92
on 23rd Jul 2006
User Rating : 10
Respect :
-1
The Nike Steam FG football boots are a really nice fit for me, which is a necessity in football boots. Also, the boot formation really helps in acceleration.
The shoe, for some reason is cut short at the tip, and it hurts your toes if you buy your normal size, so I'd recommend on buying 1/2 a siz ...
LingeS92's full review | 73 words | 1 comment added.
Review by
swarbrick93
on 22nd Mar 2006
User Rating : 10
Respect :
-1
I am a size 4 so when I buy boots I can never get the expensive ones because the smallest size is a 6. So when I saw the Nike Steam FG I had to get them. They are really good boots and I would recommend them to anyone
swarbrick93's full review | 57 words
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
