Website has unfair photo guidlines

Click here if this is your business
★★★☆☆
3.3
67.0% of users recommend this
  • Ease Of Navigation

  • Value For Money

Click here if this is your business

Guest's review of Lovestruck www.lovestruck.com

“Website has unfair photo guidlines”

★★☆☆☆

written by on 23/02/2014

I decided to join Lovestruck thinking that the male clientele looked decidedly more normal that on free sites such as plenty of fish. But there is a catch there isn't enough quantity of men on the site for it to be worth the money, after having an inactive profile I rejoined to find that most of the site had barely any new users.
My main gripe with Lovestruck however is with their photo policy. I have found it near impossible on there to get a photo accepted as a primary photo, the photos I have requested be put up all clearly show my face and are of good quality. Furthermore they do not always accept good quality photos of their male members of the site, one I might add was using a well known male model for his main display picture. Meanwhile someone with a power trip didn't want to accept my photos. This is the main reason why I wouldn't waste money on Lovestruck any further.

  • Ease Of Navigation

  • Value For Money

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0