written by on 13/03/2011
Hey guys, i picked up myself a f60 from a garage sale, in its own camera case for $10. i saw it and said i want it. its got manual or anything, any of you be able to help. email is [email protected]
Cheers
written by on 23/06/2010
hey i wanted to know if anyone can help me in sending the meanings of de buttons and why does de screen always displays f33??
written by kenletson1 on 08/02/2010
I went from a OM-10 to the F(N)60 about 6 months ago and hvenotlooked back. For someone that i nota professial but has been using a SLR for 20 years this was the best value for me. has all the features i need but might be lacking 1 or 2 that would put m in the F5 or F6 pe range ($4000.00). I am more than happy with it.
written by on 02/06/2009
The Nikon F60 has great picture quality, easy to use, and love the ability to change the lenses.
written by knm on 07/04/2008
The Nikon F60 is easy to use and takes good quality pictures.
written by Michael Markland on 06/09/2004
Overall, the Nikon F60 is a very good camera for a novice such as myself. The F60 has a lot of manual features I have only just begun to explore. For recording those special moments with family and friends as well as vacations, its ease of use is perfect!
written by catalinRO on 24/08/2004
Hi! yesterday somebody offered me a Nikon F60. An excellent camera, I bought it immediatelly! It isn't quite new, but it looks perfect! I'm very happy.
I have a BIG request for all of you: could someone send me the instructions for this camera and the meaning of its buttons...? Please!!!
U can send me an e-mail at
[email protected].
Thanks a lot!!!
written by Jean Claude Akpangni on 05/09/2003
Very good for the money I put in. I do not regret buying it at all. Very good for back up and can take in good picture much as a professional camera.
written by Clint. on 16/07/2003
The Nikon F60 is a very consitent and sturdy camera.(It can take pretty hard hits without being damaged as I have already found out.)
The multiple exposure mode would be a nice thing to have but what does a real photographer want with that option? He would seldom use it. If at all.
In short, it is a awesome camera. I love it.
written by kdp. on 09/11/2002
This is a good camera for the novice. It is easy to use, feels great to hold and is sturdy and durable. However, it's not appropriate for someone who has used SLR's before, except as a backup. If you are upgrading from a manual SLR, it will pay to go for an intermediate camera, and maybe add extra lenses over time. I found the metering to be poor in anything but ideal conditions. The autofocus is slow, particularly with long lenses. Before you buy, ask yourself what sort of photographer you are: As a novice, go for it, it will serve you well; Intermediate - spend more money; the results from the F60 will only frustrate you.
written by Maria. on 31/08/2002
I have always used the manual function of the SLR camera. My first camera was a Nikon FM10 and then I switched to a F60 thinking that I would get better shots. I was wrong..it is user friendly alright but I find the functions very limited and redundant. Now I'm going back to a fully manual camera!
written by Humanhoover. on 03/08/2002
Nikon's reputation as a producer of fine photographic gear is evident in this piece of engineering. The camera body is solid, well made, ergonomically comforting, aesthetically svelte, and is a breeze to use. This was meant as a bottom end auto-focus SLR replacing the F50 in the Nikon range, and as a bottom end price point item, I'm willing to forego certain items like depth of field preview. Basically it does what it should, it takes great pictures! The trend has been to make SLRs smaller and smaller (as with other makes), but making it smaller doesn't necessarily mean better. It is better from the weight point of view, and for travel purposes being light to handle. However, there is a limitation to size - smaller doesn't mean easier handling! The F60 feels good in the hand, and fits the hand well such that I didn't have to worry about not holding it properly and dropping it (think about the latest mobile phones, they're not easy to hold if they're too small, right?). In summary, the Nikon F60 is a well made basic SLR, perfect for beginners, amateurs, and those who wish for a second Nikon SLR body to their other bigger toys! It isn't meant for professionals, judging from the lack of more advanced features (eg. DOF, spot metering, multi-focus points), but it wasn't meant to be. For those who complain about it lacking features, they should've bought other models further up. Don't knock it! This is supposed to be a beginner / amateur auto-focus SLR which takes great pictures with minimum of fuss, and is a perfect introduction to the Nikon system of lenses - and it DOES THE JOB PERFECTLY!
Written on: 12/11/2002
Help! Anybody can give me suggest to choice between Nikon F60 and F65? Please. What beter than? How about Sigma lense 28_105,does it fix with Nikon F mount? Please again.Thank you.
Written on: 14/11/2002
Reply to Duc Quang:-
Choice between F60 and F65:- I would recommend going to F65 since it has more features than F60. Although F60 is a fine camera and well made (Made in Japan), the disadvantage is that it doesn't have multiple exposure capability, depth of field preview, manual ISO over-ride, and it has no adapter to take AA batteries. It is also discontinued in production, having been superseded by both the F55 and F65. The F65 has multi-point focusing, depth of field preview, multiple exposure capability, AA power pack adapter, auto-exposure bracketing, and can take Nikon's vibration reduction VR lenses. However, the F65's flash-synchro shutter speed is 1/90 sec, whereas the F60 is 1/125 sec, and the F65 isn't made in Japan.
The lense makers Sigma, Tamron and Tokina all make lenses compatible for Nikon, just ensure that it is AF-D compatible for Nikon. The "D" means that it has a CPU in the lens which takes the distance to the subject into consideration.
written by John. on 06/07/2002
The Nikon F60 is a brilliant intermediate 35mm SLR camera and not as bad as the other reviews are depicting it. I also have an F100 and think that for what you pay for this SLR, you are getting very good value for money. My F100 cost about £950 without a lens. It has more than enough features on it to keep even the most adventurist photographer happy. I like it. You can't go far wrong with it.
written by Maska45. on 29/05/2002
This Nikon F60 was the first 35mm SLR camera I grabbed. I bought it in Paris two years ago, in a combo with two zooms: a 28-80 AF-D and a 75-240 AF-D. An excellent setup for newbies.
Since then, I've been using it a lot, shooting different subjects (landscapes, portraits, sports, etc.) and under different conditions (everything except heavy rain) with excellent results. Just two words to qualify it: SOLID and CONSISTENT. If you get to know it well, it will never let you down.
For example, last month I shot a wakeboard festival from the shore with my F60 loaded with Kodak Supra 400 and a Nikkor 75-240 AF-D, under moderate to bright sunlight. I uploaded some pictures to show here:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=188995
The results were very good (well, I think so). Since I handheld my camera, I tried to set a fairly fast shutter speed (around 1/500) and a moderate aperture (around f/8) in order to get sharp pictures (stopping action and getting the subject in focus). However, the sky is dull and colors seems unnatural due to a lousy scanning process (Since I don't own a filmscanner, the negatives were scanned by the lab with a Noritsu digital minilab, and burned into a CD). The resulting digital images don't have any Photoshop treatment.
written by Tarquin. on 28/02/2002
I use this Nikon F60 35mm SLR camera as back-up to two F70 bodies. My kids also use it when on holiday. There is enough here to enable someone to produce good photographs even if they have minimal operational skills. I see the main problem as being the lack of long term potential for an enthusiast - s/he will want to upgrade in order to get some of the more useful features such as spot metering, cable release socket, auto-bracketing, more exact exposure setting & the ability to meter with manual focus lenses. The F70 has all these things for very little more money on the used market.
However, to get you started, it's a good choice.
written by cokeizme. on 18/02/2002
The next day after I'd bought the Nikon F60 35mm slr camera, I'd regretted and it was just taking up space in my electric dehumidifier.
Written on: 08/04/2002
What a completely useless 'review'. What is it exactly that you don't like? Webmaster: this 'review' (I use the term very loosely) should be deleted as it is taking up far too many bytes of webspace on your server :-(
Written on: 16/07/2003
Buddy,
<br> I think you absolutely don't know what a camera is used for. You're supposed to look into the veiw finder not the lens. I have the camera and I'm in love with it. It has everything I need and more. I have been into photography since I was a kid. Apparently you have no use for a camera whatsoever.
Written on: 07/07/2003
Useless review, no constructive critisism, the main question is... Why on earth did the guy buy it if it is so bad? Mine has been faultless! OK so the body isn't in the same league as the F4 - but it is supposed to be an entry into the Nikon system of lenses & accessories! In that respect it does exactly what it says on the tin! My only regret that it got me into the 'system' and I ended up buying a D1x as film does not do justice to the lenses!!
Written on: 16/04/2003
This "review" should be removed. Such nonsense distorts the results achieved legitimately from those who have taken the trouble to review it properly. I have an F60 and it's well made and will take images up to the quality of the lens. It's limitations lie in the competence (or incompetence in this case) of the photographer. It's missing a couple of features for professionals (like DoF preview and cable release) but it's not aimed at them. In terms of a nice to handle step into serious photography - it does the job as well as any rivals and better than most.
Written on: 29/11/2002
What an idiot. I am a professional photographer and own an F5, F90x, F801 and 801s and an F60. The F60 is a fine entry to the Nikon range. It has more features than my old 801 and even though it is plastic it has maintained some of the weighty feel that Nikon users love.
It is far more solid than many other SLR's on the market and takes first class photo's.
Get a brain, you obviously no nothing about photography whatsoever.
Written on: 21/11/2002
I think that this comment should be eliminated from F60 review ! I do not know who is the responsible of this ugly comment !!!
Written on: 13/11/2002
Don't blame the camera, photo quality depends on the men behind the gun.
Written on: 01/11/2002
Please state why you don't like it - its all very well saying that you do or do not like a thing, but please back up your claims. I use one along side my F2a and F3, and find it to be very good.
Written on: 26/08/2002
Surely this review was a plant meant to solicite a deluge of juxta-positional responses. Da!!!! What might this guy like for cameras...disposable or maybe Brownie?? I really liked all the illustrations he used to back his opinion like complexity of operation, malfunctions, unreliability, uglyness of design and awkwardness of handling, or could it have been lack of accessories???
<br>I'm proud of my F60 (a 60X's improvement on the F) and the pics I can produce with it, or for that matter, my child. Read the manual guy!!!
<br>I use a Nikkormat 80 - 300 mm vari-tele a lot of the time. With a pod, it's the ticket...
<br>
<br>Cheers
<br>Kim
Written on: 15/08/2002
If you don't want it, give your camera to me!
Written on: 09/08/2002
I own one of these Nikon F60 SLR 35mm cameras and I am very pleased. I have a Nikon F100 and I would say that they compare equal. I do believe that this lad with the bad camera maybe got the only piece of pooh out there.. I am very happy with my camera. thank you nikon.
Written on: 03/08/2002
Apart from the opinion given about not liking the camera, there is no comment to qualify his opinion. It doesn't say what was wrong with the camera, whether it was bad service, what he didn't like about the camera, etc. I haven't found any problems with mine, and it is a beaut, gives me great results, and is a perfect backup to my F80. I agree with the other comments about this reviewer - it is a useless review, and "cokeizme" has passed an opinion with no substance to back it up.
Written on: 18/06/2002
What *exactly* is so wrong with this camera? Where did you buy it? What about their customer service, didn't they help at all? Are you just taking the mick?
written by Guru. on 30/09/2001
Overall, a very good camera, especially at £200 with the 28-80mm Nikkor D lens. The F60 does almost everything you could wish for (apart from multiple exposure). The F60 can utilise the NAIS manual focus lenses (but with no exposure control, except with TTL flash). Very simple to use, but can be as complicated as you wish. LCD viewfinder readout of shutter and f-stop is a bonus, as is the built-in TTL flash.
Do you have a question about this product or company? Simply type it in the box below and one of our community will give you an answer
Once we've checked over your question we will put it live on the site and our strong community of experts will hopefully give you some great answers that you find useful.
We will email you when the question is on the site
As rated by our community of reviewers
Guest's Comment
Written on: 06/06/2011
you can download the manual from the Nikon website.